Screen Sizes
-
- Posts: 2996
- Joined: 02 Feb 2012, 21:32
Disregarding the guy who had a tiny screen and who was unable to count, what is the smallest screen size that anyone actually uses? This isn't counting if you can make it go smaller, this is the smallest in use.
We'll start with 1280 x 800, post a reply if you use less than this.
Obviously if someone else has already said smaller than you then there's no point posting.
We'll start with 1280 x 800, post a reply if you use less than this.
Obviously if someone else has already said smaller than you then there's no point posting.
-
- Posts: 339
- Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 19:12
Well, mine is 1366 x 768. It's It's partially smaller. >.<Camewel wrote:Disregarding the guy who had a tiny screen and who was unable to count, what is the smallest screen size that anyone actually uses? This isn't counting if you can make it go smaller, this is the smallest in use.
We'll start with 1280 x 800, post a reply if you use less than this.
Obviously if someone else has already said smaller than you then there's no point posting.
-
- Posts: 2996
- Joined: 02 Feb 2012, 21:32
Yeah, even if just one measurement is smaller, it still counts.
-
- Stabyourself.net
- Posts: 2145
- Joined: 01 Feb 2012, 20:19
My netbook (which I use a lot) has 1024x600.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 964
- Joined: 11 Feb 2012, 02:08
Asus Eee Pc? (I got the 1005PE)Maurice wrote:My netbook (which I use a lot) has 1024x600.
I got the same size...
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: 18 Mar 2012, 03:16
Back in the day I had a 600x800.
That was some shit.
Why did they think making it taller was better?
That was some shit.
Why did they think making it taller was better?
-
- Posts: 469
- Joined: 02 Feb 2012, 23:38
My desktop usess a 10 inch monitor from about 1995 = 640x480. it's so blurry that any other resolution makes text unreadable. even the [X] in the corner of windows is difficult to see. Obviously, I don't use it that much.
-
- Posts: 2996
- Joined: 02 Feb 2012, 21:32
Camewel wrote:Obviously if someone else has already said smaller than you then there's no point posting.
Maurice wrote:My netbook (which I use a lot) has 1024x600.
Raicuparta once said Trosh was the biggest spammer on this forum, but he was wrong. Many of Trosh's posts actually have a purpose. You see to like posting just for the sake of posting. Having a lot of useless posts isn't a good thing. It just marks you out as an utter moron.rokit boy wrote:1366 x 768
-
- Posts: 1594
- Joined: 03 Feb 2012, 08:36
WHAT?MYSPAMMERREPUTATIONHASBEENTAINTED?randomrandomrandomrandomrandomrandomwhycantihavespacesrandomrandomradnomrandom
my cell phone screen is 240*320 so i pwn you all. (what ? I can't play mari0 on my dumbphone ? since when ?)
my cell phone screen is 240*320 so i pwn you all. (what ? I can't play mari0 on my dumbphone ? since when ?)
-
- Posts: 199
- Joined: 03 Feb 2012, 21:20
hmmm i havent seen raicuparta in a while...Camewel wrote: Raicuparta once said Trosh was the biggest spammer on this forum, but he was wrong. Many of Trosh's posts actually have a purpose. You see to like posting just for the sake of posting. Having a lot of useless posts isn't a good thing. It just marks you out as an utter moron.
-
- Posts: 540
- Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 02:07
Just for the record, when I said that I was joking. Trosh got a post-count boost on the game release, he was just trying to help controlling the crowd, and I even told him something like "good job", maybe that was in the Beta forum. You should have quoted my insults towards rokit boy, it would have been more appropriate.Camewel wrote:Raicuparta once said Trosh was the biggest spammer on this forum, but he was wrong. Many of Trosh's posts actually have a purpose. You see to like posting just for the sake of posting. Having a lot of useless posts isn't a good thing. It just marks you out as an utter moron.
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 04:42
176 x 132 ipod nano 2g
suck it
but seriously same as Maurice
suck it
but seriously same as Maurice
-
- Posts: 321
- Joined: 03 Apr 2012, 21:43
Calculator
16 x 64
BEAT THAT
I also have a netbook that has 1024 x 600 though.
What about biggest? In physical size?
I have a 65'' TV in my living room, soon to be replaced with a 73''!
It's fun to get a bunch of people over and watch a movie on it. Games are fun too but I prefer a small monitor for no video lag.
16 x 64
BEAT THAT
I also have a netbook that has 1024 x 600 though.
What about biggest? In physical size?
I have a 65'' TV in my living room, soon to be replaced with a 73''!
It's fun to get a bunch of people over and watch a movie on it. Games are fun too but I prefer a small monitor for no video lag.
-
- Posts: 107
- Joined: 04 Mar 2012, 05:35
My pleasure!PloXyZeRO wrote:Calculator
16 x 64
BEAT THAT
My (old and broken) Tamagotchi "Dinkie Dino" is 19 x 16. (the pixels are big).
-----
My laptop is 1366 x 768