Time to Start Monetizing Mari0

General Mar0 discussion has been moved to this subforum!
Post Reply

User avatar
HugoBDesigner
Posts: 2188
Joined: 19 Sep 2012, 02:23
Contact:

Post » 18 Nov 2014, 03:48

There's still Valve. Although, there's a thing were you give them a small percentage and use their content. Not sure if this applies to Mari0, though.

Either way, I don't think Maurice will ever do it. Even if he could, Mari0's already well-known for being free, and it's not new. I know, he could sell SE, but I don't think it'd work either. Besides, it is all made in LÖVE, and I haven't seen yet a way of sharing LÖVE games that can't be "pirated" (read: *I* haven't seen yet)...

User avatar
BobTheLawyer
Posts: 2232
Joined: 01 May 2012, 21:00

Post » 18 Nov 2014, 04:30

Anything can be pirated.
He could publish it on steam.

Haha, yeah I don't think it's going to happen, but this is pretty cool.

User avatar
renhoek
Posts: 4545
Joined: 11 Feb 2012, 10:04

Post » 18 Nov 2014, 04:38

BobTheLawyer wrote:Anything can be pirated.
He could publish it on steam.

Haha, yeah I don't think it's going to happen, but this is pretty cool.
How could he publish it on steam.
This for Nintendo not Valve.

I really don't understand why people get exited about a monetized version of Mario it just seems like a weird thing to get excited about.

B-Man99
Posts: 1868
Joined: 02 Jul 2012, 00:32
Contact:

Post » 18 Nov 2014, 04:48

Chris your satirical lifestyle has gone too far

User avatar
TurretBot
Posts: 4412
Joined: 15 Mar 2012, 23:18
Contact:

Post » 18 Nov 2014, 22:42

Ads

User avatar
Superjustinbros
Posts: 2119
Joined: 29 Mar 2012, 20:39
Contact:

Post » 19 Nov 2014, 01:32

At least this would allow me to make a SMB1-styled game that's 100% authentic to the original.

User avatar
TurretBot
Posts: 4412
Joined: 15 Mar 2012, 23:18
Contact:

Post » 19 Nov 2014, 01:55

Nintendo made that one already.

User avatar
Mr.Q.Marx?
Posts: 849
Joined: 15 May 2012, 18:35

Post » 19 Nov 2014, 16:53

On the upside, things like Mario Bros. Crossover could now be sold meaning the fact that team hasn't worked on their SAS game since March shouldn't be as big of a problem.
If they were Japanese.
Since the "article" implies the west doesn't count in this.

User avatar
MagicPillow
Posts: 1108
Joined: 20 Jul 2013, 04:59
Contact:

Post » 19 Nov 2014, 21:12

Wouldn't the sprites/music/sound still be unusable, though?
Or is this allowed, too?

User avatar
renhoek
Posts: 4545
Joined: 11 Feb 2012, 10:04

Post » 20 Nov 2014, 02:15

Mr.Q.Marx? wrote:On the upside, things like Mario Bros. Crossover could now be sold meaning the fact that team hasn't worked on their SAS game since March shouldn't be as big of a problem.
If they were Japanese.
Since the "article" implies the west doesn't count in this.
Not really because most of the characters crossed over don't belong to Nintendo.

User avatar
Sašo
Stabyourself.net
Posts: 1444
Joined: 06 Jan 2012, 12:07

Post » 20 Nov 2014, 11:27

It's extremely vague and last I checked it only applies to making videos and art, and even then only in Japan.

Games is what they're about and don't think for a second they'll just let anyone (without a lengthy contract like it already is) use Mario's likeness or name for games.

Post Reply