Streaming game development: https://www.twitch.tv/stabyourself Image

Time to Start Monetizing Mari0


HugoBDesigner
User avatar
Posts: 2124
Joined: 19 Sep 2012, 02:23
Reputation: 679
Contact:

Post » 18 Nov 2014, 03:48

There's still Valve. Although, there's a thing were you give them a small percentage and use their content. Not sure if this applies to Mari0, though.

Either way, I don't think Maurice will ever do it. Even if he could, Mari0's already well-known for being free, and it's not new. I know, he could sell SE, but I don't think it'd work either. Besides, it is all made in LÖVE, and I haven't seen yet a way of sharing LÖVE games that can't be "pirated" (read: *I* haven't seen yet)...

BobTheLawyer
User avatar
Posts: 2240
Joined: 01 May 2012, 21:00
Reputation: 55

Post » 18 Nov 2014, 04:30

Anything can be pirated.
He could publish it on steam.

Haha, yeah I don't think it's going to happen, but this is pretty cool.

renhoek
User avatar
Posts: 4559
Joined: 11 Feb 2012, 10:04
Reputation: 215

Post » 18 Nov 2014, 04:38

BobTheLawyer wrote:Anything can be pirated.
He could publish it on steam.

Haha, yeah I don't think it's going to happen, but this is pretty cool.

How could he publish it on steam.
This for Nintendo not Valve.

I really don't understand why people get exited about a monetized version of Mario it just seems like a weird thing to get excited about.

B-Man99
So long, and thanks for all the fish.
Posts: 1922
Joined: 02 Jul 2012, 00:32
Reputation: 418
Contact:

Post » 18 Nov 2014, 04:48

Chris your satirical lifestyle has gone too far

TurretBot
User avatar
Posts: 4689
Joined: 15 Mar 2012, 23:18
Reputation: 719
Contact:

Post » 18 Nov 2014, 22:42

Ads

Superjustinbros
User avatar
Posts: 2101
Joined: 29 Mar 2012, 20:39
Reputation: 133
Contact:

Post » 19 Nov 2014, 01:32

At least this would allow me to make a SMB1-styled game that's 100% authentic to the original.

TurretBot
User avatar
Posts: 4689
Joined: 15 Mar 2012, 23:18
Reputation: 719
Contact:

Post » 19 Nov 2014, 01:55

Nintendo made that one already.

Mr.Q.Marx?
User avatar
Posts: 849
Joined: 15 May 2012, 18:35
Reputation: 27

Post » 19 Nov 2014, 16:53

On the upside, things like Mario Bros. Crossover could now be sold meaning the fact that team hasn't worked on their SAS game since March shouldn't be as big of a problem.
If they were Japanese.
Since the "article" implies the west doesn't count in this.

MagicPillow
User avatar
Posts: 1243
Joined: 20 Jul 2013, 04:59
Reputation: 305
Contact:

Post » 19 Nov 2014, 21:12

Wouldn't the sprites/music/sound still be unusable, though?
Or is this allowed, too?

renhoek
User avatar
Posts: 4559
Joined: 11 Feb 2012, 10:04
Reputation: 215

Post » 20 Nov 2014, 02:15

Mr.Q.Marx? wrote:On the upside, things like Mario Bros. Crossover could now be sold meaning the fact that team hasn't worked on their SAS game since March shouldn't be as big of a problem.
If they were Japanese.
Since the "article" implies the west doesn't count in this.

Not really because most of the characters crossed over don't belong to Nintendo.

Sašo
Stabyourself.net
User avatar
Posts: 1387
Joined: 06 Jan 2012, 12:07
Reputation: 343
Contact:

Post » 20 Nov 2014, 11:27

It's extremely vague and last I checked it only applies to making videos and art, and even then only in Japan.

Games is what they're about and don't think for a second they'll just let anyone (without a lengthy contract like it already is) use Mario's likeness or name for games.


Return to “Mari0”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron