If it doesn't fit elsewhere, it should go here
-
TeslaTrav
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 03 Feb 2012, 19:12
Post
» 03 Feb 2012, 19:51
Wouldn't the correct term for misc items be "Blotter"?
A twatter... Well, not being very familiar with the forum rules, here is a NSFW definition "
http://www.definition-of.com/twatter".
-
Maurice
- Stabyourself.net
- Posts: 2145
- Joined: 01 Feb 2012, 20:19
Post
» 03 Feb 2012, 20:37
I think the original idea was mixing "twitter" with "twat", but that's even better.
-
rokit
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: 03 Feb 2012, 00:47
Post
» 03 Feb 2012, 20:48
Maurice wrote:I think the original idea was mixing "twitter" with "twat", but that's even better.
you mean you changing the name or you like the definition of twatter?
-
Camewel
- Posts: 2996
- Joined: 02 Feb 2012, 21:32
Post
» 03 Feb 2012, 21:17
Maurice wrote:I think the original idea was mixing "twitter" with "twat", but that's even better.
Mixing those two words didn't make much sense for a forum name anyway, so it's good we have something that makes even less sense.
-
Lawnboy
- Posts: 836
- Joined: 03 Feb 2012, 02:24
Post
» 29 Apr 2012, 18:53
This thread has some answered questions. Why would you want a forum to be a mix of twat and twitter?!
-
renhoek
- Posts: 4545
- Joined: 11 Feb 2012, 10:04
Post
» 30 Apr 2012, 12:21
LawnboyInAJar wrote:
This thread has some answered questions. Why would you want a forum to be a mix of twat and twitter?!
I demand to have this image on every post that
bumps humps dead threads!
Last edited by
renhoek on 30 Apr 2012, 15:14, edited 1 time in total.
-
Lawnboy
- Posts: 836
- Joined: 03 Feb 2012, 02:24
Post
» 30 Apr 2012, 13:15
xXxrenhoekxXx wrote:
I demand to have this image on every post that bumps dead threads!
^This guy know's where it's at^
-
LightningFire
- Posts: 1828
- Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 17:24
-
Contact:
Post
» 30 Apr 2012, 15:11
No he doesn't. He said bump instead of hump.