Stabyourself.net forum

Posted: **30 May 2013, 04:19**

Shank: To stab with an improvised blade.

Posted: **30 May 2013, 07:47**

Street cred for providing the definition: +-1

Still, what Camewel said. Giving a bit of thought, you seem like you're better than a lot of people with corny-ass names. Just please change it.

Posted: **30 May 2013, 07:53**

I asked Sašo to change it to Shank, is that better?

Posted: **30 May 2013, 08:09**

Actually yes. Even if it is removing the last part, it sounds a lot better than that. Plus, less than half of anyone will relate it to the game.

Posted: **01 Jun 2013, 05:19**

I know I'm late, but Happyfaces, your criticism of me made me feel good.
I didn't know I was funny at all! I thought you only kept me here because my avatar made me seem banned already.
But seriously, when have I said anything funny?

Posted: **01 Jun 2013, 05:30**

Ehe... It was kinda the avatar. For a little bit. I just find idle entertainment in your posts sometimes, and your attitude is like... That perfect balance between "kid" and "Aspiring teen". Which IS a compliment, I know for a fact, because I appreciate people who can still hold on to the kid in them while still moving on with their lives and bettering themselves.

Posted: **01 Jun 2013, 05:48**

HAPPYFACES wrote:Ehe... It was kinda the avatar. For a little bit. I just find idle entertainment in your posts sometimes, and your attitude is like... That perfect balance between "kid" and "Aspiring teen". Which IS a compliment, I know for a fact, because I appreciate people who can still hold on to the kid in them while still moving on with their lives and bettering themselves.

Not a compliment. I don't want to be a teen. Ever. Teens are fairly stereotyped as jerks. I don't want that to happen, so just type the number, and remove the suffix.

13 = thir
14 = fourt
15 = fif
16 = sixt
ect ect.

Posted: **01 Jun 2013, 06:20**

Heh, see that was funny.
But that's the fun of being in a stereotyped group, you get to NOT be that stereotype and stand out.

inb4 derail
Shank:
Witty.

Posted: **01 Jun 2013, 06:29**

We're criticizing my opinion.
Also, standing out doesn't fix a stereotype. It wouldn't be much of a stereotype if that DID fix it.
Also Also, I wasn't kidding about the age thing.
But I'll probably just use Roman numerals.

Posted: **01 Jun 2013, 06:35**

TheJonyMyster wrote: Also, standing out doesn't fix a stereotype.

Never said it'd fix it :3

Just, please do take it as a compliment. You'll see that being a teen is exactly like being you, so don't let those stereotypes get to ya. Stereotypes mean nothing anyways. People only try to make them something so they have someone to relate to or someone to muse about.

Posted: **01 Jun 2013, 06:48**

HAPPYFACES wrote:You'll see that being a teen is exactly like being you

I'm different! You don't know me!
Not really. My life is a story of chaotic justice. (The chaotic part is on here)
Also, I don't really care about the stereotypes, it's just that the people who say them get a little stupider each time they say them IMO.
I don't want to go around making people stupid.

Posted: **01 Jun 2013, 12:18**

Shoosh, zis thread is here for criticizing ze peoples of SYS, not for ze shunning of shtereotypes.

Posted: **01 Jun 2013, 17:19**

HAPPYFACES wrote:Shoosh, zis thread is here for criticizing ze peoples of SYS, not for ze shunning of shtereotypes.

Okeey dokeey

Posted: **01 Jun 2013, 17:26**

Criticize me.

Posted: **01 Jun 2013, 20:48**

You go bowling with a gun.
That is just wrong.

Posted: **01 Jun 2013, 21:08**

Vyper wrote:Criticize me.

I don't recall you making a single dumb post. Your posts aren't exceptional, but they aren't dumb.

Posted: **04 Jun 2013, 08:51**

Posted: **04 Jun 2013, 09:06**

Shank wrote:.

No.

Posted: **04 Jun 2013, 09:09**

Trist3D wrote:
Shank wrote:.
No.

Yes.

Posted: **04 Jun 2013, 09:43**

Shank wrote:
Trist3D wrote:
Shank wrote:.
No.
Yes.

Maybe.

Posted: **04 Jun 2013, 10:32**

Stop or y'all are getting shanked.

Posted: **05 Jun 2013, 03:25**

yourself.net

I just realized that it's a bit hard to see how well you're seen by others with just words. Maybe I should add a rating thing.

Trist3D: 9999999999999999/10

Posted: **05 Jun 2013, 03:27**

Idiot: 10/10
Jorichi: 9.98/10
Everyone else: not good enough

Posted: **05 Jun 2013, 03:29**

Agreed!

Camewel: 0/10
Saso: 0/10
Everyone else: so much better

Posted: **05 Jun 2013, 03:30**

Camewel wrote:Idiot: 10/10
Jorichi: 9.98/10
Everyone else: not good enough

;~; wai

Posted: **05 Jun 2013, 03:30**

Not everybody can be like you, Camawel.

Posted: **05 Jun 2013, 03:32**

Camewel: 1337/1337 Awesome forum member, even though he got banned once.

Posted: **05 Jun 2013, 03:33**

I remember doing serious ratings once and I said that people would be stupid about it and then people were stupid about it and then it was all in the past.

And Turtley, I've been banned more than once (<3 saso).

Posted: **05 Jun 2013, 03:34**

Turtley3: Meh/10 Started off incredibly stupid, still incredibly stupid, but making improvements.

First serious rating system use, dood.

Camewel wrote:I remember doing serious ratings once and I said that people would be stupid about it and then people were stupid about it and then it was all in the past.

And Turtley, I've been banned more than once (<3 saso).

Well I'll just kick the stupid people out except for me.

Posted: **05 Jun 2013, 03:37**

Posted: **05 Jun 2013, 03:39**

Trist3D wrote:Also, you may discuss your criticism.

Fixed le quote.

Posted: **05 Jun 2013, 03:40**

Qcode wrote:I seriously don't think this rating stuff is a good idea. If there's no actual markings for it (how much you contribute, intelligence, attractiveness, etc.) then people can give completely unfair ratings.
People will still give unfair ratings if you did give it actual markings, but then you can say they have no good evidence for rating you badly.

Qcode

Contribution - 9/10 contributes lots of code
Intelligence - 9/10 makes good code
Attractiveness - 10/10 sexy duck

Posted: **05 Jun 2013, 03:42**

slime is a terrible forum member because he always fucks shit up. Last thing he did was make google stocks go down by 8 bucks, which also made me lose 16 bucks.

Posted: **05 Jun 2013, 04:19**

But slime made the shaders.

Posted: **05 Jun 2013, 04:20**

Posted: **05 Jun 2013, 04:27**

I should. But I don't think I'll stop any time soon. Just last week I made 60 bucks on the stock exchange.

Posted: **05 Jun 2013, 09:00**

Buying/Selling stocks should be considered gambling.

Posted: **05 Jun 2013, 10:41**

'Cept it's not rigged by a casino, but is a gamble in the future and predictions of the company or stock's performance. Ride the highs, skip the lows. It also requires your attention, almost 24/7. you never know when that unexpected low is gonna hit. Always choose a Stock with something tagged on it that people are going to want or need. Invest in more than one stock, put little bits in here and there, use the trickle-down effect...

I'm sorry, Criticism thread. Not Stocks thread. Derp.

Posted: **05 Jun 2013, 12:29**

Camewel wrote:Idiot: 10/10
Jorichi: 9.98/10
Everyone else: not good enough

But Camewel! don't you remember that art I made for you for GoStab?

Assasin-Kiashi wrote:

You even gave me a <3!

Posted: **06 Jun 2013, 04:29**

Less than three out of ten is pretty bad...

Posted: **14 Jun 2013, 03:17**

Posted: **14 Jun 2013, 03:46**

Qcode wrote:Reviving this thread cause I want to give criticism to one specific person.
Willware:
You're a great member. You consistently make good creative mappacks. I'd go so far to say you're one of the most creative people in the forum.
You deserve a lot more praise for your mappacks than you get. They never cease to interest and amaze me. Your level design and tilesets always work well together. Not only that, you make great posts as well.
Not much else for me to say except keep up all the amazing work.

Um... Wow. I really don't know what to say to that... Thank you.

Posted: **16 Jun 2013, 00:22**

Qcode wrote:Reviving this thread cause I want to give criticism to one specific person.
Willware:
You're a great member. You consistently make good creative mappacks. I'd go so far to say you're one of the most creative people in the forum.
You deserve a lot more praise for your mappacks than you get. They never cease to interest and amaze me. Your level design and tilesets always work well together. Not only that, you make great posts as well.
Not much else for me to say except keep up all the amazing work.

Have to give criticism for one particular member,
QCode, You give the worst criticism ever.

Posted: **16 Jun 2013, 00:34**

Posted: **16 Jun 2013, 00:35**

I will.

Posted: **25 Dec 2013, 05:52**

I did really improve, by not spamming a lot. Also, you do not see me get banned as much anymore, because I kinda improved. But I am working on more tilesets, but maybe a lot more originality.

Posted: **25 Dec 2013, 22:02**

Turtles, why did you bump my thread?
Seriously Tortellini, this thread has been insactive for forever.
C'mon Tsunami, you know better than that.

Posted: **26 Dec 2013, 00:36**

Turtley3:
bumps too many critisism threads

Posted: **13 Jan 2014, 16:45**

Someone tell me how terrible I am.

Posted: **13 Jan 2014, 21:25**

I don't know how terrible you are, since you only post in the Shameless Chamber. And you don't seem to make terrible posts in there.

Stabyourself.net forum

Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.

Re: Criticism.