Streaming game development: https://www.twitch.tv/stabyourself Image

Screen Sizes

If it doesn't fit elsewhere, it should go here
Camewel
Posts: 2996
Joined: 02 Feb 2012, 21:32
Reputation: 35

Post » 05 Apr 2012, 00:13

Disregarding the guy who had a tiny screen and who was unable to count, what is the smallest screen size that anyone actually uses? This isn't counting if you can make it go smaller, this is the smallest in use.
We'll start with 1280 x 800, post a reply if you use less than this.
Obviously if someone else has already said smaller than you then there's no point posting.

Zlmpery
User avatar
Posts: 339
Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 19:12
Reputation: 3
Contact:

Post » 05 Apr 2012, 00:15

Camewel wrote:Disregarding the guy who had a tiny screen and who was unable to count, what is the smallest screen size that anyone actually uses? This isn't counting if you can make it go smaller, this is the smallest in use.
We'll start with 1280 x 800, post a reply if you use less than this.
Obviously if someone else has already said smaller than you then there's no point posting.


Well, mine is 1366 x 768. It's It's partially smaller. >.<

Camewel
Posts: 2996
Joined: 02 Feb 2012, 21:32
Reputation: 35

Post » 05 Apr 2012, 00:19

Yeah, even if just one measurement is smaller, it still counts.

Maurice
Stabyourself.net
Posts: 2142
Joined: 01 Feb 2012, 20:19
Reputation: 103

Post » 05 Apr 2012, 00:25

My netbook (which I use a lot) has 1024x600.

Jorichi
Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 999
Joined: 11 Feb 2012, 02:08
Reputation: 329
Contact:

Post » 05 Apr 2012, 00:39

Maurice wrote:My netbook (which I use a lot) has 1024x600.

Asus Eee Pc? (I got the 1005PE)
I got the same size...

That Communist
User avatar
Posts: 26
Joined: 18 Mar 2012, 03:16
Reputation: 0

Post » 05 Apr 2012, 05:48

Back in the day I had a 600x800.

That was some shit.

Why did they think making it taller was better?

Kyle Prior
User avatar
Posts: 477
Joined: 02 Feb 2012, 23:38
Reputation: 5

Post » 06 Apr 2012, 03:55

My desktop usess a 10 inch monitor from about 1995 = 640x480. it's so blurry that any other resolution makes text unreadable. even the [X] in the corner of windows is difficult to see. Obviously, I don't use it that much.

rokit
User avatar
Posts: 2108
Joined: 03 Feb 2012, 00:47
Reputation: 98

Post » 06 Apr 2012, 14:14

1366 x 768

Camewel
Posts: 2996
Joined: 02 Feb 2012, 21:32
Reputation: 35

Post » 06 Apr 2012, 14:38

Camewel wrote:Obviously if someone else has already said smaller than you then there's no point posting.


Maurice wrote:My netbook (which I use a lot) has 1024x600.


rokit boy wrote:1366 x 768


Raicuparta once said Trosh was the biggest spammer on this forum, but he was wrong. Many of Trosh's posts actually have a purpose. You see to like posting just for the sake of posting. Having a lot of useless posts isn't a good thing. It just marks you out as an utter moron.

trosh
User avatar
Posts: 1596
Joined: 03 Feb 2012, 08:36
Reputation: 8
Contact:

Post » 06 Apr 2012, 14:48

WHAT?MYSPAMMERREPUTATIONHASBEENTAINTED?randomrandomrandomrandomrandomrandomwhycantihavespacesrandomrandomradnomrandom
my cell phone screen is 240*320 so i pwn you all. (what ? I can't play mari0 on my dumbphone ? since when ?)

rokit
User avatar
Posts: 2108
Joined: 03 Feb 2012, 00:47
Reputation: 98

Post » 06 Apr 2012, 14:53

I have an Xperia X 10 MINI so it's twice as small.

jasonw749
User avatar
Posts: 199
Joined: 03 Feb 2012, 21:20
Reputation: 1

Post » 06 Apr 2012, 16:06

Camewel wrote:Raicuparta once said Trosh was the biggest spammer on this forum, but he was wrong. Many of Trosh's posts actually have a purpose. You see to like posting just for the sake of posting. Having a lot of useless posts isn't a good thing. It just marks you out as an utter moron.


hmmm i havent seen raicuparta in a while...

Raicuparta
User avatar
Posts: 533
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 02:07
Reputation: 27
Contact:

Post » 09 Apr 2012, 10:18

Camewel wrote:Raicuparta once said Trosh was the biggest spammer on this forum, but he was wrong. Many of Trosh's posts actually have a purpose. You see to like posting just for the sake of posting. Having a lot of useless posts isn't a good thing. It just marks you out as an utter moron.
Just for the record, when I said that I was joking. Trosh got a post-count boost on the game release, he was just trying to help controlling the crowd, and I even told him something like "good job", maybe that was in the Beta forum. You should have quoted my insults towards rokit boy, it would have been more appropriate.

samkostka
User avatar
Posts: 302
Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 04:42
Reputation: 3

Post » 14 May 2012, 07:14

176 x 132 ipod nano 2g

suck it
but seriously same as Maurice

PloXyZeRO
User avatar
Posts: 321
Joined: 03 Apr 2012, 21:43
Reputation: 0
Contact:

Post » 14 May 2012, 07:50

Calculator
16 x 64
BEAT THAT

I also have a netbook that has 1024 x 600 though.
What about biggest? In physical size?
I have a 65'' TV in my living room, soon to be replaced with a 73''!
It's fun to get a bunch of people over and watch a movie on it. Games are fun too but I prefer a small monitor for no video lag.

renhoek
User avatar
Posts: 4559
Joined: 11 Feb 2012, 10:04
Reputation: 215

Post » 14 May 2012, 13:23

170000x99000
do I win?

FaycalMenouar
Posts: 1076
Joined: 11 May 2012, 18:00
Reputation: 2
Contact:

Post » 08 Jul 2012, 11:34

rokit boy wrote:1366 x 768

DiamondPhoenix
Posts: 107
Joined: 04 Mar 2012, 05:35
Reputation: 0

Post » 09 Jul 2012, 03:22

PloXyZeRO wrote:Calculator
16 x 64
BEAT THAT

My pleasure!

My (old and broken) Tamagotchi "Dinkie Dino" is 19 x 16. (the pixels are big).
-----
My laptop is 1366 x 768


Return to “Twatter”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Airline food, cracking open a cold one and 1 guest

cron