will there be a 1.7?

jmv3597 · Post » 28 Mar 2012, 05:17

i dont mean necessarily soon but will there be...ever?

not like its in desperate need cuz there arent many glitches in this one, i am just wondering

teryakisan · Post » 28 Mar 2012, 05:32

Take a look at the source code. There are things that are commented out as being parts of 1.8 so surely there will be a 1.7

Camewel · Post » 28 Mar 2012, 08:47

Not necessarily, Maurice could have noticed the pattern that only even ones are any good, so he's skipping 1.7.

Post » 28 Mar 2012, 10:13

teryakisan wrote:Take a look at the source code. There are things that are commented out as being parts of 1.8 so surely there will be a 1.7

What

renhoek · Post » 28 Mar 2012, 10:46

does everyone really want to update the game every five seconds just to fix one glitch?

It takes time to do things like this. Be patient!

Franpa · Post » 28 Mar 2012, 14:21

jmv3597 wrote:i dont mean necessarily soon but will there be...ever?

not like its in desperate need cuz there arent many glitches in this one, i am just wondering

You asked a developer who is scared of questions, a question. He's recently been committed to an insane asylum and is all shaking and quivering in fear and in no shape to ever work on this game ever again in fear of getting asked another question.

Post » 28 Mar 2012, 14:33

Franpa wrote:
jmv3597 wrote:i dont mean necessarily soon but will there be...ever?

not like its in desperate need cuz there arent many glitches in this one, i am just wondering
You asked a developer who is scared of questions, a question. He's recently been committed to an insane asylum and is all shaking and quivering in fear and in no shape to ever work on this game ever again in fear of getting asked another question.

What

Post » 28 Mar 2012, 20:10

Post » 28 Mar 2012, 20:57

Sašo wrote:Yes

What

Camewel · Post » 28 Mar 2012, 21:06

Maurice wrote:
Sašo wrote:Yes
What

It's called being helpful.
You may want to try it some time.

SpocKirk · Post » 28 Mar 2012, 21:11

Maurice wrote:
Sašo wrote:Yes
What

I am sensing a pattern...

Post » 28 Mar 2012, 21:35

Camewel wrote:
Maurice wrote:
Sašo wrote:Yes
What
It's called being helpful.
You may want to try it some time.

We are deeply sorry about your prior, negative experience with our customer service.
We hope that in the future, we can prove to you that we value your opinion very much.

Thanks for your time,
Maurice Guégan, Stabyourself.net lead programmer

Mari0Lu1g1 · Post » 28 Mar 2012, 21:43

It's funny... This game is completed and yet... you ask for more.
Do you email Activison for every COD Bugfix?
Or Maplestory?
It seems your taking advantage of him, besides, he already made a todo list saying what he is going to add.

EDIT:

Wait, why did-... Nevermind ._.

Camewel · Post » 28 Mar 2012, 21:48

Maurice wrote:We are deeply sorry about your prior, negative experience with our customer service.
We hope that in the future, we can prove to you that we value your opinion very much.

Thanks for your time,
Maurice Guégan, Stabyourself.net lead programmer

See, if you ignore the heavy sarcasm, this is actually quite pleasant.

Post » 28 Mar 2012, 21:50

Camewel wrote:
Maurice wrote:We are deeply sorry about your prior, negative experience with our customer service.
We hope that in the future, we can prove to you that we value your opinion very much.

Thanks for your time,
Maurice Guégan, Stabyourself.net lead programmer
See, if you ignore the heavy sarcasm, this is actually quite pleasant.

We again apologize for behavior that you may or may not have found uncivilized in the past.
We assure you it is within our intentions to provide you with the best experience while playing Stabyourself.net(tm) games as possible.

Thanks for your time,
Maurice Guégan, Stabyourself.net lead artist

Pyrosaur · Post » 28 Mar 2012, 21:54

I lol'd at this whole thing.

Mari0Lu1g1 · Post » 28 Mar 2012, 21:54

I'm very much at a loss ._.

Lone Wolf · Post » 28 Mar 2012, 21:57

The easy solution- Yes. In the future there will be 1.7. No lock this thread and be done with it.

Camewel · Post » 28 Mar 2012, 22:30

Maurice wrote:We again apologize for behavior that you may or may not have found uncivilized in the past.
We assure you it is within our intentions to provide you with the best experience while playing Stabyourself.net(tm) games as possible.

Thanks for your time,
Maurice Guégan, Stabyourself.net lead artist

Okay stop it now, it's weird to see you being so nice and helpful. Insult my intelligence then whine about how many stupid people there are or something.

jmv3597 · Post » 28 Mar 2012, 23:35

xXxrenhoekxXx wrote:does everyone really want to update the game every five seconds just to fix one glitch?

It takes time to do things like this. Be patient!

i understand that i was just wondering that why i said it doesnt need to be soon or ever really because these version is good

Mari0Lu1g1 · Post » 28 Mar 2012, 23:37

jmv3597 wrote:
xXxrenhoekxXx wrote:does everyone really want to update the game every five seconds just to fix one glitch?

It takes time to do things like this. Be patient!
i understand that i was just wondering that why i said it doesnt need to be soon or ever really because these version is good

With all the mappacks, will be busy for weeks/months!

teryakisan · Post » 29 Mar 2012, 00:28

Maurice wrote:
teryakisan wrote:Take a look at the source code. There are things that are commented out as being parts of 1.8 so surely there will be a 1.7
What

I swear I saw somewhere in the code a commented out network hook or something that specifically said it was intended for ver 1.8, Iono, maybe I hallucinated it during a 4am modding session.

renhoek · Post » 29 Mar 2012, 02:52

SpocKirk wrote:
Maurice wrote:
Sašo wrote:Yes
What
I am sensing a pattern...

What

RWLabs · Post » 29 Mar 2012, 03:06

Mari0Lu1g1 wrote:It's funny... This game is completed and yet... you ask for more.
Do you email Activison for every COD Bugfix?
Or Maplestory?
It seems your taking advantage of him, besides, he already made a todo list saying what he is going to add.

Why would anyone play Maplestory in the first place?

Guess I have to follow the pattern...

What

renhoek · Post » 29 Mar 2012, 03:09

RWLabs wrote:
Mari0Lu1g1 wrote:It's funny... This game is completed and yet... you ask for more.
Do you email Activison for every COD Bugfix?
Or Maplestory?
It seems your taking advantage of him, besides, he already made a todo list saying what he is going to add.
Why would anyone play Maplestory in the first place?

Guess I have to follow the pattern...

What

I'm surprised that you didn't mention anything about CoD since that game's worse.

RWLabs · Post » 29 Mar 2012, 06:47

xXxrenhoekxXx wrote:
RWLabs wrote:
Mari0Lu1g1 wrote:It's funny... This game is completed and yet... you ask for more.
Do you email Activison for every COD Bugfix?
Or Maplestory?
It seems your taking advantage of him, besides, he already made a todo list saying what he is going to add.
Why would anyone play Maplestory in the first place?

Guess I have to follow the pattern...

What
I'm surprised that you didn't mention anything about CoD since that game's worse.

I have never played CoD :D

Post » 29 Mar 2012, 08:45

teryakisan wrote:
Maurice wrote:
teryakisan wrote:Take a look at the source code. There are things that are commented out as being parts of 1.8 so surely there will be a 1.7
What
I swear I saw somewhere in the code a commented out network hook or something that specifically said it was intended for ver 1.8, Iono, maybe I hallucinated it during a 4am modding session.

Well there IS commented network code, but that's been in since 1.0 so saying it's for 1.8 wouldn't make much sense.

renhoek · Post » 29 Mar 2012, 09:20

RWLabs wrote:I have never played CoD :D

I N V U.

Filio · Post » 30 Mar 2012, 13:33

Let me just quickly answer the first post.

jmv3597 wrote:i dont mean necessarily soon but will there be...ever?

not like its in desperate need cuz there arent many glitches in this one, i am just wondering

NO THE GAME WILL NEVER UPDATE EVERY AGAIN. *shot*

LOL · Post » 04 Apr 2012, 22:07

Maurice posted a multiplayer update via YouTube. There has to be a 1.7

mainegeek · Post » 04 Apr 2012, 22:57

Yeah cause a video from April Fools means 100% that 1.7 will be released with networking

Post » 04 Apr 2012, 23:00

mainegeek wrote:Yeah cause a video from April Fools means 100% that 1.7 will be released with networking

Especially if there was another video posted the next day.

Post » 04 Apr 2012, 23:01

1.7 (we might change this name) will have netplay.

Camewel · Post » 04 Apr 2012, 23:05

So the answer to this topic is no.
There will totally be a 2.0 though.

Lone Wolf · Post » 04 Apr 2012, 23:09

Maurice wrote:1.7 (we might change this name) will have netplay.

Then name it as the post above me says "Mari0 2.0"
EDIT: maybe call it NEW Mari0 (like NEW Super Mario Bros.)

mainegeek · Post » 04 Apr 2012, 23:23

Sašo wrote:
mainegeek wrote:Yeah cause a video from April Fools means 100% that 1.7 will be released with networking
Especially if there was another video posted the next day.

Apparently I missed that one

renhoek · Post » 05 Apr 2012, 11:21

Lone Wolf wrote:
Maurice wrote:1.7 (we might change this name) will have netplay.
Then name it as the post above me says "Mari0 2.0"
EDIT: maybe call it NEW Mari0 (like NEW Super Mario Bros.)

what?

also why did you say "do 2.0 liek the guy above said"
and why NEW Mari0? It's just an update not a new game jeez.

Lone Wolf · Post » 05 Apr 2012, 15:51

xXxrenhoekxXx wrote:
Lone Wolf wrote:
Maurice wrote:1.7 (we might change this name) will have netplay.
Then name it as the post above me says "Mari0 2.0"
EDIT: maybe call it NEW Mari0 (like NEW Super Mario Bros.)
what?

also why did you say "do 2.0 liek the guy above said"
and why NEW Mari0? It's just an update not a new game jeez.

Because its such an anticipated update, plus a HUGE new feature.

trosh · Post » 05 Apr 2012, 15:54

the game isn't different ... multiplayer is fun but it's just a better / different way to play the same game. If mario gets a grenade launcher and you have to solve puzzles to stop bowser from killing ezio auditore, that's a different game.

Camewel · Post » 05 Apr 2012, 15:55

Lone Wolf wrote:
Maurice wrote:1.7 (we might change this name) will have netplay.
Then name it as the post above me says "Mari0 2.0"
EDIT: maybe call it NEW Mari0 (like NEW Super Mario Bros.)

New Super Mario Bros was a revamp of pretty much everything.

Post » 05 Apr 2012, 16:01

Well I'm thinking about slopes.

renhoek · Post » 05 Apr 2012, 16:02

Camewel wrote:
Lone Wolf wrote:
Maurice wrote:1.7 (we might change this name) will have netplay.
Then name it as the post above me says "Mari0 2.0"
EDIT: maybe call it NEW Mari0 (like NEW Super Mario Bros.)
New Super Mario Bros was a revamp of pretty much everything.

no it's just super mario bros 1 with online... DEFINATLY DESERVES THE NEW!
EDIT:

Maurice wrote:Well I'm thinking about slopes.

wait WHA-
wait I need a better way of emoting.

You keep telling us that there's never going to be slopes in the game...
Unless I missed the sarcasm.

Camewel · Post » 05 Apr 2012, 16:07

Maurice wrote:Well I'm thinking about slopes.

Thinking "I'm not going to add slopes haha what lulz seeing all these people think I added slopes" does count as thinking about slopes, everyone remember that.

Post » 05 Apr 2012, 16:08

Camewel - fun at parties.

When did I say I'll never do slopes?

Camewel · Post » 05 Apr 2012, 16:21

Maurice - good at trolling.

On many occasions, you said it would require a total rewrite of the engine and it's more effort that it's worth or something like that.

renhoek · Post » 05 Apr 2012, 16:24

Maurice - confusing as F*ck

there won't be online until July *releases trailer of next update with online 1st april*

read what camewel said *considers slopes*

Camewel · Post » 05 Apr 2012, 16:38

Slopes aren't impossible to make work, I made a semi-working slopes mod once.
The problem is making them not be glitch-filled. I'll try remake it sometime.

Post » 05 Apr 2012, 18:21

Camewel wrote:Maurice - good at trolling.

On many occasions, you said it would require a total rewrite of the engine and it's more effort that it's worth or something like that.

Doesn't sound like "never" to me.

trosh · Post » 05 Apr 2012, 18:35

yeah try to imagine the amount of bugs this can cause. (All of them)
But slopes would be great, you can't say the contrary.

Post » 20 Apr 2012, 20:27

xXxrenhoekxXx wrote:does everyone really want to update the game every five seconds just to fix one glitch?[/size]

Yeah,it's awkard for me,it's like Steam,they update games like....daily?