Grammar Nazi...freakstorm101 wrote: Did you mean, would you kindly?
(Coming Soon) Mari0 SMB3
- BobTheLawyer
- Posts: 2232
- Joined: 01 May 2012, 21:00
- Mari0Lu1g1
- Posts: 347
- Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 12:08
First of all I never did any of the programming.
Second of all, I don't know how to program, so I'm not being lazy (I could learn, which I will next year[aka Classes]).
Second of all, I don't know how to program, so I'm not being lazy (I could learn, which I will next year[aka Classes]).
- freakstorm101
- Posts: 154
- Joined: 20 Apr 2012, 05:21
Nope. Just a Bioshock reference.BobTheLawyer wrote:Grammar Nazi...freakstorm101 wrote: Did you mean, would you kindly?
- Legend_of_Kirby
- Posts: 752
- Joined: 14 Oct 2012, 05:37
- Contact:
Christ! My lord this fourm was about the port not bioshock! If your talking bout bioshock put it in twatter.
- Mari0Lu1g1
- Posts: 347
- Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 12:08
Still no release date?
Well the longer the better :3
Well the longer the better :3
- Mari0Lu1g1
- Posts: 347
- Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 12:08
Either Mari0 SE is going to be really awesome, or Maurice is taking a damn long time...
- Legend_of_Kirby
- Posts: 752
- Joined: 14 Oct 2012, 05:37
- Contact:
Didn't development start in May of 11 and then be released in The 3rd of March.xXxrenhoekxXx wrote:I'm starting to wander how many people know how long the original mari0 took to develop (yes it took longer than one month).
- BobTheLawyer
- Posts: 2232
- Joined: 01 May 2012, 21:00
Legend_of_Kirby wrote:then be released in The 3rd of March.
What?xXxrenhoekxXx wrote:incorrect it was released march 3rd 2012.
Renhoek, the 3rd of March = March 3rd
I was talking about the year I thought he mentioned the year but apparently not and I was being stupid. :\
anyway I checked development started in January 2011 and was released on march 3rd 2012.
so in other words he was wrong (but right about the release) and I was stupid.
anyway I checked development started in January 2011 and was released on march 3rd 2012.
so in other words he was wrong (but right about the release) and I was stupid.
- Finland Ram
- Posts: 20
- Joined: 13 Jun 2013, 11:55
LÖVE File, please?
- Finland Ram
- Posts: 20
- Joined: 13 Jun 2013, 11:55
Sorry, I thought it was a mod, because I found the SMB3 mod page and it led me here.BobTheLawyer wrote:It's a mappack.
It's a mod (it says it right in the post -_-) but it's not released as far as i know, and most likely will never be because the modder is gone.
alesan99 wrote:It's a mod (it says it right in the post -_-) but it's not released as far as i know, and most likely will never be because the modder is gone.
oh..
sorry
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 18 Oct 2014, 16:13
alesan99 wrote:It's a mod (it says it right in the post -_-) but it's not released as far as i know, and most likely will never be because the modder is gone.
The only amazing thing is that we haven't rebooted this yet.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 18 Oct 2014, 16:13
OHalesan99 wrote:alesan99 wrote:It's a mod (it says it right in the post -_-) but it's not released as far as i know, and most likely will never be because the modder is gone.
SORRY
Looks like my old account O.OJuanpis3277 wrote:OHalesan99 wrote:alesan99 wrote:It's a mod (it says it right in the post -_-) but it's not released as far as i know, and most likely will never be because the modder is gone.
SORRY
- UnderBound
- Posts: 44
- Joined: 09 Apr 2016, 22:01
I randomly joined in because smb3 is my favorite game but, I got 1-2 done!
I don't have dropbox so ill send a drive link.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByVCqA ... sp=sharing
I don't have dropbox so ill send a drive link.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByVCqA ... sp=sharing
Last edited by UnderBound on 31 May 2016, 04:22, edited 1 time in total.
- Villager103
- Posts: 506
- Joined: 31 Jan 2013, 14:50
- Contact:
YOU JUST ULTRA-MEGA NECROBUMPED THIS THREAD.UnderBound wrote:I randomly joined in because smb3 is my favorite game but, I got 1-2 done!
I don't have dropbox so ill send a drive link.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByVCqA ... 9KN3c/view
CONGLATURATION
- UnderBound
- Posts: 44
- Joined: 09 Apr 2016, 22:01
"thanks"
Last edited by UnderBound on 30 May 2016, 00:20, edited 1 time in total.
- UnderBound
- Posts: 44
- Joined: 09 Apr 2016, 22:01
ass holes
Last edited by UnderBound on 30 May 2016, 00:21, edited 1 time in total.
- Villager103
- Posts: 506
- Joined: 31 Jan 2013, 14:50
- Contact:
UnderBound wrote:thanks
- Technochips
- Posts: 608
- Joined: 12 Mar 2015, 16:05
- Contact:
congratulation for bumping a one year old thread, get out
- Villager103
- Posts: 506
- Joined: 31 Jan 2013, 14:50
- Contact:
Don't blame me. Blame the guy with the mario avatar for shitposting and bumping the thread.Julien12150 wrote:congratulation for bumping a one year old thread, get out
- Technochips
- Posts: 608
- Joined: 12 Mar 2015, 16:05
- Contact:
yes i'm telling get out to that guy
Both of you are forgetting that it's not a bump, because he's actually trying to add something. Now, I would still prefer that he made his own thread, but telling him to leave in a very rude and flippant manner is not constructive in the least.
- UnderBound
- Posts: 44
- Joined: 09 Apr 2016, 22:01
Thank YouQwertymanO07 wrote:Both of you are forgetting that it's not a bump, because he's actually trying to add something. Now, I would still prefer that he made his own thread, but telling him to leave in a very rude and flippant manner is not constructive in the least.
But is anybody still working on this?
Last edited by UnderBound on 31 May 2016, 01:41, edited 1 time in total.
- Technochips
- Posts: 608
- Joined: 12 Mar 2015, 16:05
- Contact:
1. no
2. bloody double post
2. bloody double post
- HugoBDesigner
- Posts: 2189
- Joined: 19 Sep 2012, 02:23
- Contact:
Is that really all you know how to say? "hurr durr u bumped a thread" and "duuuh double post duuuuh". I mean geez, at least put a little bit more effort into trying to explain to new users what you're trying to say. I said this before, you never explain what you mean. So how about instead of just pointing at what the user did, you actually try to explain it to them? Or maybe you could just link to the Forum's Rules. It's literally less effort than writing the same "don't double post" or "don't bump" over and over again, the link to the rules page is just under the forums' logo.Julien12150 wrote:1. no
2. bloody double post
Double posting isn't part of the rules though.
- HugoBDesigner
- Posts: 2189
- Joined: 19 Sep 2012, 02:23
- Contact:
It's not like he did a good job explaining it either